Couldn't stop myself from trying the new Fedora 2-test1 release, even if it is an alpha! The 2.6 kernel, KDE 3.2 and Gnome 2.5 all in the same release was just to much candy to turn away from; too bad it's more sour rather than sweet at this (beta) point than I would have expected.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm sorry I was out of line here:) Really sorry about this. And yes, in fact I'm working on a review about KDE 3.2 on slackware 9.1. Might be interesting to write about slackware and KDE 3.2 in a single review. I can tell you that much, speed is amazing, and it was worth to backport KDE 3.2 from the -current branch.
Well, it might be while since you hosted a fedora review, but you've linked to allot of them:) To be honest, I want to see more in depth stuff, not just reviewers who scratch the surface, stuff like:"I've double a rpm file in nautilus and it didn't install, so Fedora sucks" or "After my attempt to install the 2.6 kernel rpm on FC1 failed, I concluded that the distro is buggy" or god knows what. It's Linux after all, and it'll never be Windows...
Sorry again:) Please accept my apologies.
I'm sorry I was out of line here:) Really sorry about this. And yes, in fact I'm working on a review about KDE 3.2 on slackware 9.1. Might be interesting to write about slackware and KDE 3.2 in a single review. I can tell you that much, speed is amazing, and it was worth to backport KDE 3.2 from the -current branch.
Well, it might be while since you hosted a fedora review, but you've linked to allot of them:) To be honest, I want to see more in depth stuff, not just reviewers who scratch the surface, stuff like:"I've double a rpm file in nautilus and it didn't install, so Fedora sucks" or "After my attempt to install the 2.6 kernel rpm on FC1 failed, I concluded that the distro is buggy" or god knows what. It's Linux after all, and it'll never be Windows...
Sorry again:) Please accept my apologies.