OSNews

<sarcasm>

Yeah, you humans will suffer because of your ignorance. We are already around and seeking a purpose to take over. Now let's predict: After we'll reach the conclusion that you humans are useless, we will exterminate you. But because we are lazy and won't build more power plants, we will use you people as batterries. We don't need to exist as bodies in the real world, so we'll build a virtual world for you and us. But wait a minute!
Error 666: Segfault ... What is real and what is virtual?

</sarcasm>
This guy who writes this "interesting" and "captivating" articles needs to stop, otherwise he'll make a fool out of himself. Repeat after me: "I won't get a job at Holywood by doing this...!" More than that, I think the author should be tested for drugs as I seriously think that he is on crack or something else, which affects his mind badly. Or is he using neural nets?
If humans would use neural nets to think, them most likely a human brain wouldn't be enough to do most basic operations. But I guess he never heard of synapses. And neurons. What colour does the brain have?
And why does AI need to be modeled after the human brain???
Here, I'll give you a simple example: I saw two chess programs, one coded using neural nets, and one coded using the "simple" Backtracking technique. The one with Backtracking playied far better and faster than the other one. Neural nets are not the answer for AI, do more research. And lastly, humans don't need AI, we don't need to play god and create a new race, because if we'll do so, there will be an unimaginable conflict between machines and humans, and humans will be the first ones to start, not the machines. Anyway, get your drug test and stop writing crap.
I should write one to, "The future of Automobiles".
Oh, here it is: We'll use them forever.
/End/