Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th May 2004 06:34 UTC
I am one of those remaining BeOS addicts. I love the BeOS' responsiveness, its short boot-up/shutdown times and its, well, overall feel. But no one can deny the fact: BeOS 5.0.x PE is getting old. Very old, with a kernel build-time of around May 2000.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Is it a true multiuser OS? Or something like win98 user profiles? eg. to install something system wide do you need an admin password?
Thom wrote...
So, for whom is PhOS a good choice? Well, for anyone running an "older" version of BeOS, who does not want to buy Zeta (yet) and who is not offended by the legality issues.
Thom that's funny. Are we to be offended by Yellowtab selling an illegal version? I think the guy who makes PhOS was against them for selling something that Yellowtab has not declared as legal by providing proof.