Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 5th May 2004 06:34 UTC
I am one of those remaining BeOS addicts. I love the BeOS' responsiveness, its short boot-up/shutdown times and its, well, overall feel. But no one can deny the fact: BeOS 5.0.x PE is getting old. Very old, with a kernel build-time of around May 2000.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The correct question is: Why the heck did Be sell BeOS to Palm?
Because no other companies were available: Sony was the only other potential buyer but the eVilla experience was a complete technical failure and soon abandoned.
Don't also forget that Gassee has been in the past a member of the board of directors of 3com
> Why the heck did Palm buy BE anyways?
The correct question is: Why the heck did Be sell BeOS to Palm?
Because no other companies were available: Sony was the only other potential buyer but the eVilla experience was a complete technical failure and soon abandoned.
Don't also forget that Gassee has been in the past a member of the board of directors of 3com