It is when I read articles like this that I have "my blood all going up to my head" (that's a Greek saying for people that get angry). So apparently, Apple is trying to patent "transparent windows that do a certain action after fading away". While I don't personally find this "innovation/invention" patentable, it's fine with me: Apple is doing the best it can to secure its business (maybe I would do the same if I had shareholders on my back).
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, they are not wrong. Having spent real money on R&D and _really_ innovating, it is about securing that investement.
The problem starts when you are granted patents that don't deserve to be granted. That's a fine line, I agree, but there should be more strict rules by the US patent office while they should employ more knowledgable people to go through these questionable patents.
No, they are not wrong. Having spent real money on R&D and _really_ innovating, it is about securing that investement.
The problem starts when you are granted patents that don't deserve to be granted. That's a fine line, I agree, but there should be more strict rules by the US patent office while they should employ more knowledgable people to go through these questionable patents.