Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 21st May 2004 01:17 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



However, the articles in the past about Miguel Icaza having some sort of letter do not inspire confidence. If you have it tell people about it, and if you are doing a patent review then tell people about it.
Since Mono uses different implementations to .Net (but does the same thing), even for the Microsoft-oriented stuff, I'm not convinced. Maybe it would have been better to take the ECMA standards and create a new API? Who knows.
See http://dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2003-October/011544.html .... discussion on "Patent Free" .NET APIs ... which ended up being almost a flame war
Read Miguel's comments ... http://dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2003-October/011567.html
But curiously nearly 8 months later, there are no patent problems ...