Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 4th Jun 2004 06:22 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I started using Be R4.5.2 in Jan. 2000. It absolutely blew me away. I had been pulling my hair out trying to figure out Linux. I'm surprised I did not hear about Be before. In 1998 I was working at a company that was designing HP motherboards, and were required to test with about every commercial OS known. I remember talking to engineers about Next, SCO Unix / x86, OS/2, etc. But not BeOS.
Years later, I'm still a fanatic. Still try do write code for it. Theres still a huge following. Drivers are still being released. Patches written, etc. Still runs on all my current hardware. Software is coming very slow for it these days, but I still enjoy it. I have a PowerMac dual-G4 and a PS2 that fill the void that BeOS doesn't quite fill.
It seems to be Be made the focus shift right when they were getting noticed for the years of work they did. I wonder if staying private would have changed the outcome.