Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 6th Jun 2004 18:09 UTC, submitted by Gürkan Sengün
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



>That's probably the most hideous thing I've seen since Windows 95!
Everything is relative. Yes, today, it looks hideous. But it looks 99% the same as NeXTSTEP did (http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=4042) and when NeXTSTEP was big in the beginning of the '90s, everything else looked terrible back then.
> What's the point of this?
I don't think there is a real point, at all. Maybe a bit of melancholy and "bringing back old memories" for the people who used NeXTSTEP back then and maybe to provide a prooving ground for GnuSTEP, but that's about it.
If there was a REAL effort to extend GnuSTEP and its surrounding software in terms of an operating system instead of just catching up with the OpenSTEP API implementation, to continue where NeXT *left off* and *innovate* and create the next-gen of the NeXTSTEP system, then yes, there would be a point. But something like this can not be achieved with 2-3 people having fun over the weekend.