I'm sure everyone is sick of reading reviews of Suse 9.1 by now but perhaps this one is a little different. This is not an ordinary review in the sense that I don't provide lots of colourful screenshots, or ramble on endlessly about the included software versions and other trivial things. Written from the point of view of a Debian user trying to switch to an "easier" distribution, I concentrated on how Suse stacks up compared to some of the traditional Debian strengths.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
None of the reviews that I've read have mentioned whether SuSE 9.1 supports Mount Rainier rewrite out of the box, although SuSE seem pretty quiet about it, too (despite employing the maintainer). I'd really expect reviews to cover this kind of stuff, especially since the current generation of distros is likely to be the first which doesn't require kernel patching and extra userland stuff just to make things like CD-MRW work. It is news!
None of the reviews that I've read have mentioned whether SuSE 9.1 supports Mount Rainier rewrite out of the box, although SuSE seem pretty quiet about it, too (despite employing the maintainer). I'd really expect reviews to cover this kind of stuff, especially since the current generation of distros is likely to be the first which doesn't require kernel patching and extra userland stuff just to make things like CD-MRW work. It is news!
So, any reports of success, anyone?