Linked by Ryan (aka Aurex) on Thu 10th Jun 2004 19:55 UTC
Ever since Microsoft started publicly outing Linux with their "Get the Facts" campaign, I have seen numerous articles and studies about the TCO (total cost of ownership) of both products in a head to head manner. However, I have yet to see one article discuss the TCO for home users and small businesses. I have thought long and crunched many numbers to devise a conclusion to this years old debate and I think the results are obvious... Windows is way more expensive than Linux.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
I installed SuSE 8.0 on a newly bought machine and it worked perfectly. Just get a well supported distro or buy a pre-installled Linux machine from Walmart. Again, if you install Windows XP on a new machine that is not pre-installed you won't get as far either. Linux has better out of the box hardware support. With Windows you have to insert driver CDs.
The hardware support is moot. Get a pay for distro and you will get tons of propreitery drivers that "just work".
Er, have you ever actually used Linux, or are you just a complete liar?
I've never had a single device which hasn't worked out-of-the-box on Windows XP, and I've never inserted a "driver disk"... do those even exist anymore?