OSNews is pleased to host today an exclusive interview with Waldo Bastian, the well known KDE developer and SuSE employee. Waldo has been involved pretty much in all levels in KDE's code, from Konqueror to kdelibs, to games and Kicker. Waldo speaks today about the success of KDE, its future, UnitedLinux, development and much more.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Either you know nothing about GNOME, or you're just trying to spread FUD.
> It is so much more refreshing than the doublespeak you get out of the GNOME people
What "doublespeak"?
> New GNOME look = Linux XP
The "New GNOME look" is almost the same as the 'old' GNOME look, which predates WinXP by about three years.
> Evolution = Outlook
Evolution was designed by Ximian to be a drop-in replacement for Outlook. Businesses are afraid to try new things partly because of the costs and time needed for retraining. This is not a problem with Evolution. Similarly, Konqueror was designed to be usable as both a Web browser and a file manager like IE. I see nothing wrong in that approach, provided that it is done well.
> Mono = .NET
Mono has nothing to do with GNOME. There is non Mono code in GNOME, and there are no plans to change that.
> cp -r Windows Linux
ln -s FUD-troll Michael
> Yeah, I've got an attitude about GNOME. It's part of an mindset that I see that doesn't believe in innovation, but merely replication.
Ummm... How's that? As much as I like KDE, it looks a lot like Windows to me. GNOME is far more flexible and customisable.
> KDE seems like an honest effort to build great software. It is funded by Linux companies, not by Microsoft.
That's true. But what does that have to do with GNOME?
Either you know nothing about GNOME, or you're just trying to spread FUD.
> It is so much more refreshing than the doublespeak you get out of the GNOME people
What "doublespeak"?
> New GNOME look = Linux XP
The "New GNOME look" is almost the same as the 'old' GNOME look, which predates WinXP by about three years.
> Evolution = Outlook
Evolution was designed by Ximian to be a drop-in replacement for Outlook. Businesses are afraid to try new things partly because of the costs and time needed for retraining. This is not a problem with Evolution. Similarly, Konqueror was designed to be usable as both a Web browser and a file manager like IE. I see nothing wrong in that approach, provided that it is done well.
> Mono = .NET
Mono has nothing to do with GNOME. There is non Mono code in GNOME, and there are no plans to change that.
> cp -r Windows Linux
ln -s FUD-troll Michael
> Yeah, I've got an attitude about GNOME. It's part of an mindset that I see that doesn't believe in innovation, but merely replication.
Ummm... How's that? As much as I like KDE, it looks a lot like Windows to me. GNOME is far more flexible and customisable.
> KDE seems like an honest effort to build great software. It is funded by Linux companies, not by Microsoft.
That's true. But what does that have to do with GNOME?