Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Mon 28th Jun 2004 23:16 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





that is completely wrong as apples clearly states on the link you posted
you used the word "full" for 64-bit support
And he would be right.
"Tiger’s new 64-bit features enable developers to address massive amount of virtual memory for command-line applications, server applications and computation engines while continuing to fully support 32-bit applications"
"features" does not equate with "full"
it appears to be a bit of an enhancement of what panther now does as well.
Tiger is fully 64-bit.
IF you had only bothered to read further.
"Tiger ships with 64-bit ready Xcode development tools, so you can take full advantage of the Tiger’s enhanced 64-bit capabilities right out of the box. Tiger’s new 64-bit pointers enable individual processes to access massive amounts of virtual memory. The enhanced kernel, plus a 64-bit version of libSystem, let command-line programs, background daemons and network services directly manipulate up to 16 exabytes of virtual memory. That’s enough to address all the physical memory on an Xserve G5… or a cluster of millions of them.
Tiger’s LP64 model for 64-bit pointers means that developers can easily port code written for other 64-bit UNIX systems. LP64 support in Tiger provides for 64-bit long, long long and void* as well as 32-bit int data types."
If that is not full 64-bit support. What is according to you?