Linked by Michael Hall on Thu 15th Jul 2004 07:35 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



"Let hope his business doesn't grow or he's going to run into some pretty big time consuming problems with his clients. There is a reason RHAT/SUSE are interested in the "big end of town" Since this person has a business he should too."
What kind of "time consuming problems" does Redhat/Suse solve that Slackware does not? The graphical tools do not speed up administration, they merely lower the learning curve.
There are enterprise applications that are only supported on RHEL/Suse such as DB2, WebSphere, etc... But not counting enterprise apps that you can not (easily) install on Slack, what makes Redhat or Suse so much better in the SMB market?