Linked by Michael Hall on Thu 15th Jul 2004 07:35 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Well we run FreeBSD and Slackware (along with a few legacy BSDi machines) at a mid-sized ISP with about 20K users. I can say that the Slackware machines always surprise me with their performance.
Example
BSDi sendmail server - 4 gig Hz Intel serving as the main mail machine for 20K+ users. Always has a load avg above 3.x.
FreeBSD machine as the primary MX for said BSDi server running qmail and clamav, 2.4 Ghz machine, always running 0.8 - 1.5 load avg. No local deliveries, forwarding only.
Slackware Machine as the primary MX and delivery machine (qmail and vpopmail) with clamav scanning for 15k+ users on an AMD Duron 1.2 always around 0.15 - 0.55 load avg.
Dunno what that says about FreeBSD and BSDi, but Slackware sure does scale. Both the FreeBSD and Slackware machines handle about 300,00 incoming messages per day. The Slackware machine also deals with outbound user emails and mailing lists, as well as POP and IMAP clients.
Jib