Linked by Michael Hall on Thu 15th Jul 2004 07:35 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



"I'm talking about every distribution I've used with an automatic dependency resolver -- RedHat, Fedora, Gentoo, Debian -- sooner or later breaking my system, i.e., itself, by screwing something up."
Also rubbish. Any solid package management utility with solid packages should work well with precompiled binaries. I know this is very true for Debian GNU/Linux Stable and Testing. The point is that instead of doing the stuff yourself, you outsource it to people who know what they're doing. In the case they do / did not know / knew what they're doing, you can download the source package and compile that yourself. Much more convenient than doing it yourself by default which costs time. Loads of time. Heck, even the BSD's agree with me on that given they want to improve their Ports collection and provide binaries for it by default.
Because of this, the only reason i see why one would prefer to compile his/her own binaries is because of optimalisations (not very better performance if not less) or paranoia (which boils down to the fact you'l need to use binaries to compile from source) or when its broken (see above)
PS: there's another Slackware article on ofb.biz