Linked by Osho GG on Mon 19th Jul 2004 18:24 UTC
KDE This is not a typical review of a desktop environment such as KDE or GNOME. These are my observations when I updated from KDE 3.2.3 to KDE 3.3 Beta1.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
questions answered ;-)
by Matt on Tue 20th Jul 2004 18:15 UTC

@Anonymous (IP: 61.95.184.---) - Posted on 2004-07-19 20:30:57
Thank you, this is pretty much what i was looking for ;)

@neutron
yeah, i think it makes a difference too. id like to point out that gnome isnt the only one with a human interface guideline, both apple and microsoft have one too.

@anon
kde uses the windows approach in that regard, which has its pluses and a few minuses(mostly that as soon as you leave or change apis your like a babe in the woods, not an insult or troll cause thats where i was about two months ago). a good HIG cannot be replaced by a component framework and common dialogues, because the focus of a good HIG should be user interaction rather then just look. what kde seems to have is a component framework and some usability guidelines which is more then enough, if developers read and understand em ;-)