Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 20th Jul 2004 18:50 UTC, submitted by Jono Bacon
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



This is the same guy who wrote the looking glass article a while back.
You could theoretically take this concept and apply it to Project Looking Glass too; a 2D representation of a button could be natively represented in Project Looking Glass as a 3D button
This will not only make all of the software more integrated, but it will put software in peoples hands in an environment that is familiar to them.
These are cool concepts to explore in a small project or lab, not on my desktop. Most people are happy using KDE, I hate it, and like being able to choose to avoid it.
There are many people out these just like me that are happy on low clutter, flat, 2D desktops built for speed.
The idea of adding 3D, rounded bevels, and whiz-bang animations to my desktop is just feature bloat, and I don't want it near me.
Fisher Price needs go after both MS and KDE for their recent desktop themes.