Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 20th Jul 2004 18:50 UTC, submitted by Jono Bacon
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



troll / flame / ... ...
kde/gnome war...
The author was writing about usability, not about how gnome is superior to kde or the oposite...
If you prefer gnome, that's great, it exists. If you prefer kde, YO MAN, here it is !
I think the author made a mistake taking kde for his example cause the kde team try to make the desktop unified. The classes behind kde (kde classes or QT) are just great. Plus the kde team integrates some gtk stuff into their own libs to make the desktop muxh unified... I don't know if gnome did this with the gtk stuff...
The main idea is, IMHO, using the same "template" displaying dialogs, or everything the user interact.
After this, if the template is diplayed with gnome / kde or anything else, it doesn't matter.
when we got templates unified, we have to talk about "dialogs" not for the users but between apps...
If I drag something on an application, what do I have to transmit ? file path, meta-infos... How do I transmit this stuff ? etc ...
template on one had for user dialog
code and library (KDE ONE;) for application/internal dialogs...
my 2 cents...