Linked by Tarun Agnani on Thu 5th Aug 2004 18:45 UTC
Linux Yoper Linux V2 was released a few weeks ago (July 13, 2004). After reading the release announcement on Yoper's website, I decided I had to try it. Yoper claims that version V2 "is the fastest Out-of-the-Box Linux system in the World".
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yoper is pretty good!
by andrew on Thu 5th Aug 2004 23:22 UTC

I was none too impressed with the first release of Yoper, and with the various issues around it at the time. But now I would urge everybody who might still be weary to not let the past prejudice them agains Yoper of today. It is a good distro.
Installation is a snap, performance very good, and Apt makes management of software easy.
I also think Yoper strikes right balance between simplicity and features.
Take the installer for example: yes, it limits you to one partition, but it does allow a selection of filesystems, unlike many 'easy distros' which make choice for you (and that choice is usually ext3, to my dismay). It doesn't allow piece-by-piece choice of software, but it does have two profiles: desktop and minimal. It is text based, but where it really matters it switches to Sax2 to configure the display.
I don't think Yoper has any specific focus but it is a good all-purpose distro; do with it what you like! As a desktop, its KDE is a lot more developed than Gnome or XFce4, but they are there. If someone doesn't want KDE for example, I imagine they could start with Yoper minimal install and then apt-get Ygnome. Want a server? Start with minimal install and again, apt-get what you need. Want a desktop for a new user? I think Yoper would be quite a good choice for a beginner, because it is quite simple to use and run, but without resorting to distro-specific 'command centre' or 'wizards'.
All in all, I think I'm going to keep Yoper. Now I'll need to get another machine for distro-hopping! (yes, I can be quite happy with my system yet still keep looking around - call it curiosity, call it a hobby... It could be that as someone noted the effort could be better spent elsewhere - but that would be missing the point of having a hobby, wouldn't it?)