Star Free Can Mean Big Money: The Open Source Economy
Linked by David Adams on Mon 16th Aug 2004 17:44 UTC
Editorial I read something in one of the comments for an OSNews posting a couple weeks ago that sent me thinking. It wasn't an original or profound thought. In fact, it's a rather commonly-held opinion that happens to be quite misguided. It's an opinion summed up by the "open source = communist" meme that gets thrown around in thousands of flamewars all over the internet. In this essay, I will explore why this idea is wrong and demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of economics.
E-mail Print r 0   · Read More · 129 Comment(s) http://osne.ws/67q
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Re: QuantumG (IP: ---.hay.kbs.net.au)
by drsmithy on Tue 17th Aug 2004 00:15 UTC

Yeah, now that it's hip and groovy. Around the time GCC was written it was common practice to take BSD code and make a proprietory fork. Look at the UNIX history tree.

Most proprietry unixes had (and have) their own compilers.

The causal link between GPL vs BSD and people being exposed to free software (note, there was no freakin' "open source") [...]

I'm calling it "open source" to avoid confusion between with "free" as most people understand it and "free" as open source advocates use it.

[...] is pretty blatant, if you asked for the GCC source code you got the entire GNU collection.

I think you missed my point. What's the difference between getting a tape full of GPLed software and a tape full of BSD-licensed software ?