Linked by Stefan Michalowski, M. Sc. on Thu 19th Aug 2004 08:27 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Those were just examples to show that the claims about closed source software on linux are simply not true.
Now you are addressing an other problem and that affects mainly open source programs. Wether what you describe is indeed a problem, has been solved for a long time now by good package managers, desperately needs an other approach (like autopackage) has been discussed at great length here and on various other sites.
But still, what our anonymous friend claimed, that his company had to support 656 different version if it produced linux software is simply wrong. That's all I wanted to point out.
Btw.: acrobat-reader, crossover-office, winex (or whatever it is called today), textmaker... ;-D