Linked by Stefan Michalowski, M. Sc. on Thu 19th Aug 2004 08:27 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



That's funny, I was always under the impression that Visual C++ was a lot faster than GCC (the C++ part). However, there are most likely other reasons for that, and I don't blame GCC for being 'slower' since GCC is targeted for many platforms.
But while many feel that closed source developers should be responsible for releasing compatible software, we keep being put up with ugly staticly linked motif apps thanks to that attitude. If Mozilla uses a C++ based plugin system, then it will fail on the GNU/Linux platform. No one wants to have to ask their customer what version of Mozilla they use, what compiler was used to compile it, and them present them with the proper version. Also, what happens when such a company goes bankrupt? Should we expect everyone to open up their code? I personally think not.