Linked by Stefan Michalowski, M. Sc. on Thu 19th Aug 2004 08:27 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Open source means everything is fixable with enough time and effort. What large companies are interested in is reducing time and effort spent on what is not their main focus (software development and bugfixing), and devoting it instead to selling more widgets. So in reality, whether you are dealing with closed or open source, what the large company wants to know is how long you, the vendor, will support the OS and associated applications, 'cause the large company does not want to be bothered. That's what they're paying you for, so they don't have to be bothered.
Just read a couple of interviews with Red Hat execs where they're talking about a 5-6 year support time frame, which is pretty good, but not out of line with MS's support for WinNT and some of its business applications, for example.