Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 1st Sep 2004 19:01 UTC, submitted by Michael Saunders
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



This is interesting, seems to be a common line of thinking among the BeOS crowd.
Very few of the core Syllable developers, myself included, are not ex-BeOS users. I once booted a LiveCD demo of BeOS 4.5, but that's about it. Not that I don't admire its design and elegance.
Is it because of X Windows or of the kernel, itself?
The whole package. The problem is that there is no such thing as a "standard Linux distribution". There are all these different little bits, all largely developed in isolation, and brought together in a loose-knit sort of mishmash by the distribution maintainers. To borrow a phrase, it's like making bookshelves from mashed potatoes.
Some Linux advocates call this a strength, but then they're delusional.