Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 19th Sep 2004 09:23 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Not really as interesting as the article made it sounds...
I've browsed a bunch of websites with it, and while I was a bit surprised by its CSS capabilities (CSS 1 looks fairly good, but CSS 2 sites are rendered pretty badly), websites using older design techniques (nested tables and other junk) are completely unreadable: table cells may be empty as it appears on slashdot.org or reuters.com (granted: those sites are badly coded).
NetFront is also pretty slow on some websites, javascript support is clearly a problem here: you're going to get all those pop-ups, pop-under or other nasty dhtml advertisement junk.
Overall, it appears to me NetFront is trying to do more than it is really capable to do. Yet another lightweight browser, nothing more.