Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sun 19th Sep 2004 09:23 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



> The freeware vs FOSS argument also has some major influence on some. I don't really care for it that much here, but since the software is practically not portable this browser runs on a lot less platforms than existing. The power to port lies at a small minority.
Yes. The software can be nice and usefull but if it runs on x86 only that is is really useless for many people.There is lot of people running Linux/NetBSB/something on PPC or SPARC (for example) and there is lot of IRIX and Solaris users. Open source usually can be ported to those platforms but closed source freeware can't.
> I'm actually interested in running this on non-x86 Unices! I mean, try Mozilla on an older MIPS or SPARC. Its just a 'bit' too slow and i'm not always on information-mode.
Yes, Mozilla on IRIX (on my SGI Indy) works nice but is too slow. But Dillo is not much faster here (I have no idea why) :-(