Linked by Christian Paratschek on Thu 23rd Sep 2004 05:59 UTC
Editorial After reading Adam Scheinberg's original article "The Paradox of Choice" and Kevin Russo's response, I want to add my personal comments to this discussion. I will quote Adam and Russo several times and pick up their arguments.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: RE: kitty73
by kitty73 on Thu 23rd Sep 2004 07:35 UTC

Fair enough, but it's still unlikely that "your parents, your friends, your relatives", basically every XP user you know will not install an AV software but still keep Windows thoroughly updated, and that every exploit ever patched would be fixed _before_ it can damage you. I'm not blaming MS when it's really expected that the users keep care of their software, we just have to _accept_ the fact that to keep an OS running and connected to the net you have to take care of it.
The article even states that in the opinion of the author Linux, were it in a monopolistic state of diffusion and were it available in a single distrivbution/batch would be more or less as vulnerable as Windows. I am not so sure of this fact, but I see the point.
I am a Windows XP user (AV, Firewall, no IE or Outlook) and a Linux user and I am willing to work to keep them up and running. Atm it's really easier and smoother with Linux, but denying that there's a problem is not really the way to go.