Linked by Shlomi Fish on Sat 16th Oct 2004 07:28 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



The parrot talks Perl 5 and Perl 6. Its even rumored that we will be able to use Perl 5 objects, modules and functions from within Perl 6 and the other way around. But the interesting stuff is how one might be able to use methods from C++, python or java code from within a Perl 5 or 6 script. As well as parrots cross-platform assembly style language.
I look forward to exploring all of this technology. I'd also like to learn ocaml, python, C, objective C, C++, C#, python and maybe java if its still around when I finally get the time to look at it.
Perl 6 adds a lot of features that I will find useful if I need that much organization and complexity in my code. But Perl 5 has everything I want right now. I'm just writing objects and simple methods to handle most of my stuff. I don't need complex methods that process data differently depending on how its called or what datatypes are passed to it and I don't need complex datatypes atm. In the future I'd love to have the power Perl 6 has to offer for when I might need it and I love the idea that I can make use of all this Perl 5 code I've been writing without rewriting it. What more could I ask for? Well, compiled binaries, but I'll deal with that later. Perl 6 is one step closer to native binaries, IMO.
But I guess that is why I feel the need to learn C and stuff.