Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 19th Oct 2004 16:55 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



"The few experiences I had with python show me a very pleasing, complete and clean language."
Python is not suitable for large projects. It is also not suitable for projects where your code has to interact with other code, possibly from unknown and untrusted sources. Java can do this safely because of its security model. Although Python does offer you protection from accicently shooting yourself in the foot, it offers virtually no protection against someone else shooting you in the foot intentionally.
But the real question is why use mono instead of Java? Why would you want to help a Microsoft standard gain even more control over the Internet?
And lets not forget that .NET's open standard is really a red herring. Only the core is .NET. But most of the classes that provide the funtionality (ASP.NET, etc) are proprietary Microsoft technologies. Sure OSS projects can clone them. But that probably puts them on shakey legal ground.