Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 19th Oct 2004 16:55 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I'm looking for advice and comments on which Linux distribution is most appropriate for venturing into Mono development.
I define "Mono development" broadly, to include mucking about with Beagle, the inotify kernels, etc.
I'd prefer not building a Mono environment from source. I've tried it and it hurts. I want to use Gnome 2.8.
SUSE appears to be the platform that is best supported, with precompiled Mono packages, but dbus, hal and Gnome 2.8 are not "officially" available. (James Cogley's ULB 2.8 is very nice, but does not yet include dbus and hal.). The same applies to Fedora. Debs are available for Debian Unstable/Ubuntu, but they don't appear to be as complete or as current as the SUSE/Fedora rpms provided at the Mono site.
So, what's the best choice? Use SUSE, add dbus and hal myself, and then Cogley's ULB? Do the equivalent with FC2?_