Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 19th Oct 2004 16:55 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Well seeing as how there are no mandrake packages, I just compiled up mono, the compiler, monodevelop (and all it's dependencies), and a few apps like f-spot and muine (muine is a loooooooong way away from being useful). Blam! seems kinda cool, but I'd never use it. Then again, the only Java apps I use are Eclipse and Azareus.
In terms of installation, can the mono people *please* provide a single precompiled installer that is distribution independent (e.g. like Sun do with Java). And try to standardize on what the Mono platform is, so that apps can depende on "mono platform 1.2", instead of 6000 dependencies.
The advantage MS has is that they can go: .NET provides this library for doing X, and you will use it. But in the OSS world, people use whatever they feel like, so every app has 200 dependencies. I thought with mono we could get rid of this crap. Just download a .NET .exe file and run it.
Bah.. anyway, it seems kinda fast, but pointless at the moment.