OSNews

I'll try to be as concise as possible here.

-------------------------------------------

Eugina:

"You are VERY welcome to write something better. We will publish it"

Thank you for the invitation, but I am wondering if you have missed my point.

To be clear... I strongly believe in the freedom of OSnews.com to publish whatever content it wishes as I believe in the freedom of it's readers to express their opinions on such content.

I also believe that those who do not understand the above simple rule will be lost in defensive/offensive unproductive arguments.

Given the above, I was under the impression that OSnews.com took it's position seriously and was dedicated to delivering articles of value to it's readers.

My point is this...

I do not run OSnews.com, you do. So, if you wish to have your readers respect and attention, do the homework and publish relative, intelligent articles.

-------------------------------------------

James Fryman:

"I would be the first to write it if I knew what I was talking about. So, instead of bitching, write that article, and give the guy a little credit for trying."

It's not "bitching" it's individual opinion.

As far as "credit for trying"... no.

Next year, after Billions more are lost due to exploits, write a letter to Bill G and tell him "thanks for trying".

Sooner or later, people will realize that this new age of technology needs to be handled in a very serious and careful manner. This must include education. The article in question does nothing to educate. It only spreads miss-information.

-------------------------------------------

Thom Holwerda:

You missed the point completely.

It's not about spelling errors and grammar. It's about the lack of factual intelligent information.