Linked by David Adams on Tue 26th Oct 2004 16:30 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Smartpatrol: Calm down. He's absolutely right in that point - that an Oracle license costing $5000 is overkill for many cases, where mySQL is quite adequate. There are a lot of cases where Oracle will be required over mySQL still.
He didn't say "open source is good and closed source is bad", he just said that many free (as in beer) products are good enough to replace commercial alternatives in a lot of instances.
The problem I have with his assertion is that he did not suggest a cheaper closed source alternative. I agree an Oracle/SUN solution would very well be overkill but a Dell/Microsoft solution? Each case would need careful examination and would never fall under such a blanket statement presented by the author.