Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Nov 2004 10:19 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Egads. Why would you want the "bloat" of gnome on QNX? But i agree, not "all" linux apps are a simple recompile. Look at FreeBSD's ports tree. All those applications sources had to be tweaked in order to compile, same goes for QNX. Linux applications arent 100% POSIX compliant, nor is linux itself.
Sure some basic console apps will build without a hitch, but try just about anything else and you run into problems. Granted not hard to fix, messing with makefiles and source code a tiny bit is about all it takes, but it still isnt as simple as untarring a src tree and compiling.
Also the quote about "having to have to QNX compiler" is false. I NEVER use QCC, never. Everything i've built was with GCC.