Linked by Christian Paratschek on Tue 23rd Nov 2004 07:56 UTC
For this article, I chose to take a slightly different approach than the standard "Linux distribution review". As I have written not just one, but two reviews of Fedora Core 2 for this site, I want to base my review of Fedora Core 3 on my experiences with its direct predecessor. Update: FC3 shots here.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
i admit that i don't know much about selinux.
but: i said that the inclusion of selinux went quite well. and that is probably true, not because i had a problem with it, but there was no outcry from the community after fc3 was released. so, contrary to the betas of fc2 that had horrible selinux problems, fc3 seems to have a good selinux implementation.
regards,
christian