For this article, I chose to take a slightly different approach than the standard "Linux distribution review". As I have written not just one, but two reviews of Fedora Core 2 for this site, I want to base my review of Fedora Core 3 on my experiences with its direct predecessor. Update: FC3 shots here.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
It used to be that RH really only put moderately stable software in their dist, they did a pretty decent job of not including versions with horrible issues. Fedora though seems to be more typical of a "bleeding edge" distribution and it's including new versions with all their problems.
As for your sound, you should research it. I highly doubt it's truly unsupported... Either OSS or ALSA probably has some driver somewhere for it; I've got a couple of machines with AC'97 variants (AC97 actually isn't the sound, there is a multitude of sound codecs used and called AC97).
It used to be that RH really only put moderately stable software in their dist, they did a pretty decent job of not including versions with horrible issues. Fedora though seems to be more typical of a "bleeding edge" distribution and it's including new versions with all their problems.
As for your sound, you should research it. I highly doubt it's truly unsupported... Either OSS or ALSA probably has some driver somewhere for it; I've got a couple of machines with AC'97 variants (AC97 actually isn't the sound, there is a multitude of sound codecs used and called AC97).