Linked by Christian Paratschek on Tue 23rd Nov 2004 07:56 UTC
For this article, I chose to take a slightly different approach than the standard "Linux distribution review". As I have written not just one, but two reviews of Fedora Core 2 for this site, I want to base my review of Fedora Core 3 on my experiences with its direct predecessor. Update: FC3 shots here.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Fedora core 3 is an instable distro by default....
hey look we have the latest xorg toy
hey look we have the latest selinux patches
ecc ecc ecc
from my point of view,fedora will even be a stable distro because every 6 months there's a new toy that must be tested.
and if you decide to not upgrade in 2-3 months you will have
an unsupported linux.
yes for that troubles there is a fedora legacy but who can assure me that i will receive a proper support ?
now let's take ubuntu... this distro unlike fedora assure me that i will have maximum
support for 18 month and if you want extend support for
other months you can always pay few bucks at canonical Ltd.