Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 23rd Nov 2004 01:43 UTC, submitted by Lumbergh
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



more than a language which has control over itself, we need our languages to interact.
we have a different tool for each job. but how many people build houses with JUST as sawz-all (reciprocating saw)?
not all languages need do every thing; each language has its place. LISP has some amazing powers to self-transmofigy, powers this article talks a lot about, but it lacks in other places. the real key is being able to combine languages. write the performance critical core in a fast mostly-static language & late-bound language, then run the logic-execution engine in LISP.
More than anything else, Microsoft scares me on this front. CIL is the single most useful forward facing quanta of progress i've seen from the computer industry as a whole in 10 years.