Linked by Fabian M. Schindler on Tue 23rd Nov 2004 18:53 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



It is unfair to try to say "well, this distro includes media support and therefore it has an adavantage" when Ubuntu is not US based, while Fedora is.
Because of the legal problems surrounding MP3 patents, and other things it is very wrong to try to compare distributions based on which one decided to deal with a legal gray area and which one does not.
Instead, the fact that Fedora respects the laws of the country, and tries to not to entangle it's users in legal troubles is a better advantage to me.
Additionally, you failed to mention that all the patent covered things you installed in Ubuntu are only through the unsupported restricted repository.
As it is, there is a legal risk for them even providing that.
Whether or not you agree with the laws or the legal problems, they exist, they are there, and many distributors are starting to be be careful about them.
So, with that in mind, this review would come out 5:5, a Draw.