Linked by Fabian M. Schindler on Tue 23rd Nov 2004 18:53 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Do you know, Ubuntu ship the latest Gnome, hal, OpenOffice, etc...
Is it a problem or it is not ?
Depends for who. For me, it is.
The Ubuntu bootable discs don't work on my laptop. Why? Because it uses the lastest GRUB instead of the tried-and-true ISOLINUX. The Ubuntu LiveCD was not very stable on my desktop. Why? Probably because it uses the lastest Gnome, HAL, OpenOffice... Funnily enough, it doesn't use X.org even if that one is newer and more stable (in _my_ experience, mind you).
I am in favour of progress but a bit of conservatism is always good.
Linux 2.6 is stable.
Technically, you are right. However, the newer releases (.7, .8 and .9) got many changes that brang some stability issues. The 2.6.5 was far more stable to me than the 2.6.9. Unfortunately, I need some bugfixes from the 2.6.9...
Anyway, 2.4 is definitely more mature.