Linked by Neven Bijelic on Wed 24th Nov 2004 08:45 UTC
No doubt, all of you have heard of Xfce and those who haven't will hear about it soon anyway. I remember trying out Xfce for the first time back on SuSE 9.0. I am not sure if it came with the distrobution or if I downloaded it. At the time 9.0 came out I remember thinking to myself "nice, good potential, could be eyecandy, fast..." but I still logged into KDE upon booting. Sure I tried Gnome but somehow for a windows-commer KDE was more user friendly at the time. Update: More screenshots of XFce.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
If you say "I talk out of my ass" then you surely deserve little respect. I wrote my master thesis running XEmacs under FVWM on a 486 with so little RAM I can't even remember the amount. When I compiled the kernel on that machine I could go for a long coffee break. I can assure you XEmacs took a *long* time to load, so you don't even need to start talking "Firefox" and other modern applications. So before you say "I talk out of my ass" I suggest you take a good look at the mirror and think twice before writing insulting comments.
I know what old machines can do. And if you reread my post (that is, assuming you can comprehend what you read), you will notice that for older machines I suggested FVWM. Not KDE. Not Gnome. Not XFce.
Please add something to the discussion besides showing up your "attitude".