To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
@A nun, he moos
I mostly noted that you insinuated I was trying to disguise my IP.
If I was insinuating it then I wouldn't have used the
I believe having access to the source code does, in fact, give you more freedom. For starters, it gives you the freedom to learn from the code and modify it.
I'll grant you that the source code does give you more "freedom" to modify code, but that's not what the fangirl refers to. The fangirl equates that freedom to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from persecution, etc...
I believe the GPL is in fact just as free as the BSD license. So, are you so lacking in vocabulary that you can't present arguments to support your views, and must resort to insults?
Freedom as in how does the license restrict what I can do with this code. BSD/MIT/X11 place very little restrictions on what you can do with the code. GPL has more restrictions on what you can do with the code - at least with regards to distribution. That is just fact. The GPL is more restrictive, and no matter how long the fangirls try to redefine freedom, people are not going to buy it.
Uh, whatever. I'm not a programmer, I'm a game designer. What's your point? If you're trying to convince anyone that you don't have an anti-Linux bias, I'm sorry to say that so far you're failing miserably.
That's the thing. I don't have an anti-linux or pro-linux, or anti-ms or pro-ms bias because I'm not a fangirl. Software is just a tool not a religion. Most of the time I won't try to convince a fangirl of anything because they are so demented and indoctrinated that it's not worth my time.
You call me a troll, and I will call you a fangirl this time.


