Linked by David Adams on Tue 21st Dec 2004 17:45 UTC, submitted by Lumbergh
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



But just assuming that were to happen, if you ported them all to Windows, I would simply use them in Windows. Why?
Well I have 2 powerfull ones to not run them on Windows, security and price.
And if have them running on a securer and cheaper one then I'll stick to that option.
And that's your option. now take that to bigger market lile enterprices and countries.
Now, if I release that I have The same applications in a more secure and cheap enviroment than i'll be able to say "The hell with this buggy Windows OS, I'll use Linux", but I can't