Almost a year after our much discussed Mac OS X 10.1 review, it is time to write down our impressions from the new version of OSX, Jaguar 10.2. Is Jaguar worth the full $129 USD? Dive in for more. Update: Slashdot seems to agree with our review, at least on the backwards compatibility issue.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
..that Apple should have done what MS did and provided an option to turn off all UI animations and effects.
WinXP runs fine on 300mhz K6/2/128Mb RAM/Onboard GFX when all interface appearance functions are disabled.. in fact on the same tasks its approx 10% faster than Win2k on it...
Apple are providing an elegant workaround by using a graphics accelerator to draw the UI but its still a workaround for a problem... their UI has made a "feature" jump that is somewhat beyond the ability of current hardware to deal with.
Lets hope - although if Apple are suddenly going for hardware speed, it seems very unlikely that they will.. that Apple will realise this eventually.
I also find it somewhat disturbing that backward compatibility has been broken so soon...
..that Apple should have done what MS did and provided an option to turn off all UI animations and effects.
WinXP runs fine on 300mhz K6/2/128Mb RAM/Onboard GFX when all interface appearance functions are disabled.. in fact on the same tasks its approx 10% faster than Win2k on it...
Apple are providing an elegant workaround by using a graphics accelerator to draw the UI but its still a workaround for a problem... their UI has made a "feature" jump that is somewhat beyond the ability of current hardware to deal with.
Lets hope - although if Apple are suddenly going for hardware speed, it seems very unlikely that they will.. that Apple will realise this eventually.
I also find it somewhat disturbing that backward compatibility has been broken so soon...