Linked by Jeremy Wells on Tue 8th Feb 2005 08:05 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I'd disagree with a few of the statements in the article:
First, I was under the impression that the Linux kernel's ACPI implementation wasn't buggy - but most laptops use a lot of weird-ass extensions and their implementations are often buggy.
APM is okay, but has it's issues - which is why ACPI was created. Frankly I don't see the big deal - my laptop does everything except suspend-to-RAM (hibernating works, and without a FAT partition) using ACPI - which is pretty much what he'd found.
And saying the KDE project's design goal is clearly to look like Windows is ludicrous. I'm sure that's the last thing on their mind.
With the number of times he mentioned Macintoshes, it sounds like he'd be better off buying one rather than trying to find another interface that he thinks mimics it.