Linked by Jeremy Wells on Tue 8th Feb 2005 08:05 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



rather than the cluttered, sickeningly sweet, drippy, transparent eye Kandy of KDE.
Although the Gnome developers may not admit it, the Mac user interface appears to be their design goal while KDE's design goal is clearly to duplicate the Windows UI. To most people, the consensus would be that the Mac is the clear winner in usability and appearance.
If you didn't want the comments to degenerate into yet another GNOME/KDE flamewar, why did you include these two statements? A simple "I prefer GNOME so I wanted to use a GNOME-based distribution" would have been better.
I've yet to hear a compelling reason to install Ubuntu, and given your problems with it I'm surprised your review was so positive. These days, no modern distribtion from one of the bigger players should cause too many problems, even on an old laptop.