Linked by Neil Lucock on Tue 22nd Feb 2005 22:17 UTC
I'd better start by admitting that I'm a fan of KDE. It's not because it works like Windows, but for the quality of the tools available. However, a GUI is just a way of doing something and I think I've been a bit dismissive of the Gnome desktop up to now. I read a few reviews of Ubuntu, looked at their web site and decided to have a look. I wanted a general purpose (desktop) distribution and an opportunity to get to know the Gnome utilities.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Hi, i used to be a kde fan until i first tried ubuntu.
yes kde is more mature and complete, that's true, but i got to prefer gnome when it comes to look'n'feel. I'd still like to have killer apps like amarok or k3b for gnome though...
to the author: kde and gnome are *two different projects*. saying "i don't like nautilus becasuse it's not konqueror" is not useful, infact your "article" is pretty much useless imho
hint: try kubuntu (ubuntu kde edition). trolling is bad for the OSS community
Hi, i used to be a kde fan until i first tried ubuntu.
yes kde is more mature and complete, that's true, but i got to prefer gnome when it comes to look'n'feel. I'd still like to have killer apps like amarok or k3b for gnome though...
to the author: kde and gnome are *two different projects*. saying "i don't like nautilus becasuse it's not konqueror" is not useful, infact your "article" is pretty much useless imho
hint: try kubuntu (ubuntu kde edition). trolling is bad for the OSS community