Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 21st Mar 2005 11:22 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



You guys can argue all you want... Arch is another fad distro, just like Gentoo.
There are far too many people wasting time and effort duplicating other peoples' efforts in the open source world these days. Why start a new distro, when you can improve another?
Arch brings nothing new to the Linux distro landscape. Gentoo brought nothing new to the Linux distros either. Everything's still based on the Linux kernel, still based around the same tools and ideas from years past, etc. Same shit, different package.
No, I'm not a Windows or Mac advocate. Yes, I use Linux based operating systems every day, and I'd like nothing more than see Linux/GNU/free software get better for everyone.
We're getting nowhere, because of the infighting between developers and maintainers of software.