Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 21st Mar 2005 11:22 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



I used Arch when it was in the 0.5 - 0.6 stage, it worked well for me, took a bit to configure. But then as someone mentioned earlier I started worrying about upgrades breaking something. Now that was over a year or so ago, so they may have fixed that up now.
After that, trying to find a new distro, I did the whole distro install marathon, install a distro, try it for a week or so, install the next, and so on. I am now on Ubuntu, not because its "cool", but because it just worked, and that ended the marathon. I am now running it on my AMD64 and it works great.
just my 2 cents.