Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 21st Mar 2005 11:22 UTC
Linux 2003 was the year with Gentoo written all over it in the Linux universe. Last year was Ubuntu's & MEPIS'. I believe that Arch Linux's year is the current one. Read more for a comparison of Arch to existing distributions, and why we think it rocks and where we think it still requires some work.
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Nice review, but one disagreement
by Shahar on Tue 22nd Mar 2005 18:53 UTC

That was a nice review, I've been using Arch now for over a year.

One thing I disagree with you though: I do not think Arch should start creating more custom text files for printers and the like. I'm afraid it will become text-bloated in time and will lose its simplicity factor, which was the reason I started using it myself.

rc.conf is really great - and it refers to the core components of an operating system - timezones, modules, daemons etc., and not to optional components.

Another thing, using checkinstall is indeed easier than makepkg, however it can not (as far as I know) track dependencies and other things which pacman needs (and uses). There is however the prototype PKGBUILD which fits the common ./configure && make && make install process.