Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 21st Mar 2005 11:22 UTC
Permalink for comment
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



That was a nice review, I've been using Arch now for over a year.
One thing I disagree with you though: I do not think Arch should start creating more custom text files for printers and the like. I'm afraid it will become text-bloated in time and will lose its simplicity factor, which was the reason I started using it myself.
rc.conf is really great - and it refers to the core components of an operating system - timezones, modules, daemons etc., and not to optional components.
Another thing, using checkinstall is indeed easier than makepkg, however it can not (as far as I know) track dependencies and other things which pacman needs (and uses). There is however the prototype PKGBUILD which fits the common ./configure && make && make install process.
Shahar.